JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 28, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Bibiana Patricia Ortegon Amador

✓
Topic · hard data
Correccion Error Mecanografico Sentencia C-474/03
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se realizaron las correcciones en la Sentencia C-474/03, toda vez que se presentaron algunos errores mecanográficos en cuanto a las referencias a la ley demandada consistentes en lo siguiente: corregir el fundamento 12 por cuanto no se trata de la Ley 397 de 1999, es la Ley 397 de 1997.

Corregir los dos numerales de la parte resolutiva, pues no se trata de la Ley 397 de 1999, es la Ley 397 de 1997.

Y finalmente, corregir los fundamentos 1 y 4 del salvamento parcial de voto del Magistrado ponente de la citada sentencia ya que no se trata de la Ley 397 de 1999, es la Ley 397 de 1997.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. 1.- Corregir el fundamento 12 de la sentencia C-474 de 2003 por cuanto no se trata de la ley 397 de 1999, es la ley 397 de 1997.
  2. 2.- Corregir los dos numerales de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia C-474 de 2003 pues no se trata de la ley 397 de 1999, es la ley 397 de 1997.
  3. 3.- Corregir los fundamentos 1 y 4 del salvamento parcial de voto del Magistrado ponente -Eduardo Montealegre Lynett- a la sentencia C-474 de 2003, ya que no se trata de la ley 397 de 1999, es la ley 397 de 1997.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
Partial dissentEduardo Montealegre Lynett
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela